Join
FAIRGRADE

Name

E-mail

Sign FAIRGRADE's
On-line petition at iPetitions, a website dedicated to public petitions.

Retroactive Honors Recommended!
FAIRGRADE Continues Call for Oversight on Implementation
FAIRGRADE's Future

RETROACTIVE HONORS RECOMMENDED!


On June 25th, Superintendent Dale recommended that FCPS retroactively provide an extra weight of 0.5 quality points to courses in math, science, English and social studies taken for high school credit during high school or middle school. Superintendent Dale did not recommend that FCPS weight any foreign language courses or music/art/drama courses, other than AP or IB courses in those disciplines. According to Assistant Superintendent Peter Noonan, the general idea was to weight core academic and not to weight "electives."

 

Superintendent Dale did not recommend weighting science or technology electives such as DNA science and quantum physics at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science & Technology (TJ), but recommended weighting all of TJ's social studies electives. School Board members questioned why FCPS should weight an unlimited number of TJ's social studies electives but not TJ's challenging science and technology electives, many of which are prerequisites for TJ's required senior research laboratories.


For your convenience, FAIRGRADE has compiled a complete list of courses recommended for 0.5 honors weighting and the list of approved dual enrollment courses that are retroactively weighted by 1.0 quality points into the charts you see below.  


High-Achieving Base High School and TJ Students:

Extra Quality Points for Required Classes Typically Taken During High School

 

Superintendent Dale’s recommendations would require typical TJ students to take more unweighted courses than comparable base high school students.  The chart below analyzes credits required for the FCPS Advanced Diploma and the TJ Diploma.  It assumes that these students took 3 courses for high school credit during middle school: Honors Algebra 1, Honors Geometry, and the first year of a foreign language.

 

Summary Chart – All Subjects

Total Credits During HS – Base School

Extra Quality Points During HS – Base School

Total Credits During HS – TJ Typical

Extra Quality Points During HS – TJ Typical

English

4 credits

3.0 (2 honors, 2 AP)

4 credits

2.5 (3 honors, 1 AP)

Social Studies

4 credits

3.5 (1 honors, 3 AP)

4 credits

3.0 (2 honors, 2 AP)

Foreign Language

2 credits

None (2 unweighted)

2 credits

None (2 unweighted)

Math

2 credits

1.0 (2 honors)

3 credits

2.0 (2 honors, 1 AP)

Science core

4 credits

2.5 (3 honors, 1 AP)

4 credits

2.0 (4 honors)

Tech

NA

NA

3 credits

0.5 (2 unweighted, 1 honors)

Fine/Practical Arts

1 credit

None (1 unweighted)

2 credits

None (2 unweighted)

PE/Health

2 credits

None (2 unweighted)

2 credits

None (2 unweighted)

Sub-Total

19 credits

10 points

24 credits

10 to 11 points

Unconstrained

Electives

9 credits plus summer school

varies

4 credits plus summer school

varies

Total Courses

28 credits plus summer school

10.0 (req’d) plus

quality points from 9+ electives

28 credits plus summer school

9.5 to 11.0 (req’d) plus quality points from 4+ electives

 

Of 28 credits, these base high school students take about 19 credits to fulfill Advanced Diploma requirements.  Of those 19 credits, 6 must be unweighted, 8 can be honors, and 6 can be AP classes.  Base high school students also have 9 unconstrained electives, which they can use to take unweighted, AP or post-AP courses.

 

Of 28 credits, typical TJ students take 24 credits to fulfill TJ Diploma requirements.  Of these 24 credits, 8 would have to be unweighted, 12 would be honors, and 4 could be AP classes.  TJ students also have 4 unconstrained electives, which they could use to take unweighted, honors (social studies only), AP or post-AP classes.

 

Students can create time for more unconstrained elective credits, such as by taking summer school classes or placing out of classes.  Students vary in how they use their extra elective periods.  The Superintendent’s proposed weighting scheme would give TJ students an incentive to take more social studies and fewer science classes.

 

The following tables provide details on courses typically taken to satisfy diploma requirements by similar base school and TJ students.  The information in the tables below were used to generate the summary table, above.

 

English

Base School

TJ

Notes

9th

Honors English 9

Honors English 9

TJ requires Honors English 11, while base schools allow 11th grade students to take AP English Language.

10th

Honors English 10

Honors English 10

11th

AP English Lang

Honors English 11

12th

AP English Lit

AP English Lang or AP English Lit

Weight for Req’d Credits

3.0 quality points

2.5 quality points

Req’d Credits

4 credits

4 credits

 

 

Social Studies

Base School

TJ

Notes

9th

Honors World 1

None required

TJ students are not required to take history in 9th grade, and instead are required to take a fourth credit of a non-AP history “elective.”

10th

AP World Civ

Honors World 2

11th

AP US History

AP US History

12th

AP Gov’t

AP Gov’t

Weight for Req’d Credits

3.5 quality points

3.0 quality points

Req’d Credits

4 credits

4 credits

 

 

Foreign Languages

Base School

TJ

Notes

9th

2nd year class

2nd year class

 

10th

3rd year class

3rd year class

11th

None required

None required

12th

None required

None required

Weight for Req’d Credits

None

None

Req’d Credits

2 credits

2 credits

 

 

Math

Base School

TJ

Notes

9th

Honors Alg 2

Honors Alg 2/Trig

Some students place out of precalculus, but this table assumes the standard accelerated FCPS math sequence.

10th

Honors Precalc

Honors Precalc

11th

None required

AP Calc BC

12th

None required

None required

Weight for Req’d Credits

1.0 quality point

2.0 quality points

Req’d Credits

2 credits

3 credits

 


 

Science

Base School

TJ

Notes

9th

Honors Biology

Honors Biology

TJ allows students to substitute AP Physics C for Honors Physics.  TJ requires seniors to take Honors Geosystems, instead of an AP science class.

10th

Honors Chem

Honors Chem

11th

Honors Physics

Honors Physics

12th

AP Science class

Honors Geosystems

Weight for Req’d Credits

2.5 quality points

2.0 quality points

Req’d Credits

4 credits

4 credits

 

 

Tech

Base School

TJ

Notes

9th

 

NA

TJ students take computer science in 9th or 10th grade. TJ’s Senior Tech Lab is often a science research lab.

10th

 

Computer Science

11th

 

Science/Tech Elective

12th

 

Senior Tech Lab

Weight for Req’d Credits

None

0.5 (senior lab)

Req’d Credits

0 credits

3 credits

 

 

Fine and Practical Arts

Base School

TJ

Notes

9th

No specific year for these courses

9th grade Design/Tech

Students often take music, art, or drama to fulfill this requirement, but can substitute extra tech classes or foreign language classes.

10th

No specific year for arts courses

11th

12th

Weight for Req’d Credits

None

None

Req’d Credits

1 credit

2 credits

 

 

PE/Health

Base School

TJ

Comments

9th

PE/Health

PE/Health

 

10th

PE/Health

PE/Health

11th

NA

NA

12th

NA

NA

Weight for Req’d Credits

None

None

Req’d Credits

2

2

 


The table below compares the high school schedules of two similar students.  The table illustrates the combined impact of different diploma requirements (Advanced Diploma versus TJ), different standard course sequences and options, plus Superintendent Dale’s weighting recommendations.

 

Base School with AP Program – All 28 Credits

 

English

Honors Eng 9

Honors Eng 10

AP Eng Lang

AP Eng Lit

Social Studies

Honors World History 1

AP World Civilizations

AP US History

AP Gov’t

Math

Honors Alg2

Honors Precalc

AP Calc AB

AP Calc BC

Science

Honors Bio

Honors Chem

Honors Physics;

AP Env. Science

AP Biology

Foreign Lang.

2nd year

3rd year

4th year

AP Foreign Lang.

Arts

Band

Band

Band

Band

PE and other electives

PE

PE

 

Unweighted elective[1]

Summary

4 Honors,

3 unweighted

1 AP,

3 Honors,

3 unweighted

4 APs,

1 Honors,

2 unweighted

5 APs,

2 unweighted

 

TJ – All 28 Credits

English

Honors Eng 9

Honors Eng 10

Honors Eng 11

AP English

Social Studies[2]

None

Honors World History 2

AP US History

AP Gov’t and

Honors elective

Math

Honors Alg2/Trig

Honors Precalc

AP Calc BC

Post-AP Math

Core Science

Honors Bio

Honors Chem

Honors Physics

Honors Geosystems[3]

Other Tech/Science[4]

Computer Sci. (required)

AP Biology

DNA Science

Honors Biotech Lab (required)

Foreign Lang.[5]

2nd year

3rd year

AP Foreign Lang.

 

Arts[6]

Tech (required)

 

Band

Band

PE

PE

PE

 

 

Summary[7]

3 Honors,

4 unweighted

1 AP,

4 Honors,

2 unweighted

4 APs,

1 Honors,

2 unweighted

3 AP/post-APs,

3 Honors,

1 unweighted

 



[1] Some base high schools require AP Biology, AP Chemistry and AP Physics C students to take a second non-AP credit of science when they enroll in these three AP science classes.

[2] All TJ students must take World History & Geography 2 in 10th grade instead of AP World Civilizations, plus a second non-AP social studies “elective” credit.

[3] TJ does not offer AP Environmental Science, and instead requires Honors Geosystems.

[4] All TJ students must take computer science and a senior tech lab.  Many TJ senior tech labs have prerequisites such as DNA Science and quantum physics.  Those classes are unweighted.

[5] TJ’s foreign language classes are compacted and accelerated, so if TJ students take an AP foreign language class, they usually take it in their fourth year of the language.

[6] “Arts” include “practical arts” classes such as 9th grade tech.

[7] Some TJ students take AP exams without taking the related AP classes, such as when one of their unweighted or honors classes covers the material taught in an AP class.

 

 

*FAIRGRADE will post additional updates as soon as we obtain accurate and consistent information about the implementation process and timeline that FCPS will follow in weighting honors courses.

 

CHANGE MANAGEMENT PLAN


In response to FAIRGRADE's request, FCPS has stated that it is planning for post-implementation analysis of the new grading scale and grading policy.

 

FCPS officials informed FAIRGRADE that FCPS will analyze how grade distributions under the new grading policy compare to grade distributions under the old grading policy. FAIRGRADE will also continue urging School Board members to establish a task force that includes parents and FAIRGRADE representatives, to ensure that the post-implementation data is collected in a transparent and unbiased manner. FAIRGRADE will also urge FCPS to make this data available - by high school - to parents in the years to come.

 

FAIRGRADE'S FUTURE


FAIRGRADE will continue to keep parents informed of all developments surrounding implementation of the new grading policy. In the coming weeks, we also will send an update about FAIRGRADE's plans to transition into a broader organization that will continue serving the parent community by providing information about the many policy and budgeting issues challenging our school district in these difficult economic times, and information about upcoming School Board elections.

 

Thanks to you and the 10,000+ coalition of FCPS students, parents, supportive teachers and principals, we all made real and positive changes to Fairfax County Public Schools through FAIRGRADE!

 

Please stay involved! FAIRGRADE needs you and our schools need you!

 

 


History of  Vote to Change FCPS' 48 Year Old Grading Policy
 
On May 7, 2009 - in response to an 18-month campaign launched by FAIRGRADE's 10,000+ supporters and findings from FCPS' own research and report - the FCPS School Board voted 11-1 for a new, 10-point grading scale.  

At-Large Member James Raney was the only Member to vote NO.  Vice-Chairman and Braddock District Representative Tessie Wilson spoke out against the new grading scale, but in the end voted YES.  Lee District School Board Member Brad Center demonstrated continued diligence to this issue and responsiveness to FAIRGRADE supporters which led to the 11-1 vote. 

From the beginning, FAIRGRADE asked that changes to the grading policy be based on research.  The FCPS Report, which was made public in December 2008, clearly demonstrated that FCPS GPAs under the former grading scale (in use until Spring 2009) were depressed compared to GPAs of students who attend equally competitive and rigorous high schools.  The School Board's vote acknowledged what the community has recognized for years: FCPS’ high standards are due to our quality teachers, a strong curriculum and motivated students – not the grading scale.

*New FCPS Grading Scale beginning 2009-2010
A (93-100) = 4.0
A- (90-92) = 3.7
B+ (87-89) = 3.3
B (83-86) = 3.0
B- (80-82) = 2.7
C+ (77-79) = 2.3
C (73-76) = 2.0
C- (70-72) = 1.7
D+ (67-69) = 1.3
D (64-66) = 1.0
F (below 64) = 0.0
 
Former FCPS Grading Scale (*used from 1962 thru Spring 2009)
A (94-100) = 4.0
B+ (90-93) = 3.5
B (84-89) = 3.0
C+ (80-83) = 2.5
C (74-79) = 2.0
D+ (70-73) = 1.5
D (64-69) = 1.0
F (below 64) = 0.0 
 
The FCPS Grading Policy Report noted the critical importance of weighting for all honors courses.  FAIRGRADE made the point that retroactive weighting of honors taken prior to Fall 2009 was a necessary component of FCPS' grading policy reforms.  When students apply to colleges, over half the advanced courses on their FCPS transcripts typically come from honors courses rather than AP or IB courses.  The FCPS college survey revealed that the vast majority of high schools provide 0.5 weights for honors courses and FAIRGRADE strongly pushed that FCPS should do the same. 

In January, the School Board agreed and voted to weight honors classes retroactively by 0.5 "if practicable." According to the FCPS Information Technology department, it was determined that retroactive weighting of honors courses was "practicable" and that FCPS software could be easily programmed to apply retroactive weighting.  

The amended School Board motion also increased AP/IB weights to 1.0 and weighted them retroactively for classes taken up to and after January 2009. Qualifying honors courses (including pre-AP and pre-IB) will be weighted 0.5 effective the 2009-2010 school year.  

And on June 25, 2009, Superintendent Dale recommended that honors courses in mathematics, science, English and social studies receive a 0.5 weight beginning the 2009-2010 school year and be retroactive.  In addition, Superintendent Dale recommended that students at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (TJHSST) will receive a weighting of 0.5 for all required math, science, English and social studies courses.  The weighting of 0.5 will be awarded to all math courses above the level of AP courses that are not dual enrollment and to all science, math and technology research and mentorship courses. 
 

A Review of the FCPS Report's Findings 

On Friday, January 2, 2009, Superintendent Dale made his much anticipated recommendation to the School Board about the FCPS Grading Policy.  He recommended changing the weights for advanced courses only and recommended that the outdated, six-point grading scale remain in place.  Dr. Dale said there was no conclusive evidence that showed the six-point grading scale disadvantages FCPS students.  
 
FAIRGRADE successfully lobbied FCPS School Board members that the FCPS report does demonstrate conclusive evidence that the current grading scale hurts students' chances for college admissions including:
  1. The FCPS Report shows the actual high school grades (A,B, C, or D) are the MOST important factor in college admissions.  This finding is repeatedly acknowledged in the report with citations from the National Association for College Admissions Counseling (NACAC), the College Board, and FCPS' own college survey conducted for the report. 
  2. The FCPS Report shows that 55% of colleges do NOT recalculate GPAs for college admissions. 
  3. The FCPS Report shows that 89% of colleges compare an individual applicant against the entire applicant pool. 
  4. The FCPS Report undeniably confirms that the current six-point scale used by FCPS results in FCPS students having notably lower GPAs than non-FCPS students with similar SAT scores but graded on a 10-point scale, thereby putting FCPS students at a competitive disadvantage for college admissions. 
  5. The FCPS Report shows that 75 school systems in 12 different states have adopted the 10-point scale in the last few years. 
  6. The FCPS Report found NO evidence to support the current six-point scale. 
  7. The FCPS Report clearly demonstrates on page 49, Figure 6, that changing both the weights for advanced classes and the grading scale benefits ALL students, especially those with GPAs below 3.75.
  8. Grading scale has NO bearing on a high school's academic standards.  A vast majority of our nation's very best high schools use the 10-point scale (see the 2008 Gold Medal Winner High Schools). 
  9. A school district's academic standards is measured by their four-year college attendance rates for high school graduates, mean SAT scores and AP/IB class participation and performance - all areas in which FCPS students excel nationally.
  10. FCPS' own research report concludes that changing the weights would benefit the highest achieving students (those with GPAs of 3.75 or higher), but changing the grading scale would benefit ALL students, especially those in the mid and lower ranges of the grade distribution. (see FCPS Executive Summary, page 10 and FCPS Findings, page 49).
FAIRGRADE also argued that the Superintendents in Arlington, Montgomery County, Falls Church City and the schools on the 2008 Gold Medal List would surely contest FCPS Superintendent Dale's assertions that the 10-point grading scale "lowers academic standards."  On January 7, 1009, a leading education newspaper, Education Week, named Maryland Schools as the nation's best - which includes Montgomery County Schools.  President-elect Obama, who certainly has high standards, selected Sidwell Friends schools in Washington, DC for his daughters.  Sidwell Friends grades on a 10-point scale.  

Shortly after the report's release, some School Board members expressed concerns about grade inflation.  But at the FCPS Roundtable held last August, the Dean of Admissions for George Mason University, Andrew Flagel, told Dr. Dale and the audience that FCPS teachers will normalize their grades to whatever grading scale is adopted.  Flagel said, "I think that most of the changes are extraordinarily reasonable...I don't think you will see a radical shift in grades coming out.  I think you'll see a moderate one."
_____________________

"If I were a parent in Fairfax County, I would want it changed."

Source:  Shannon Gundy, University of Maryland
Director of Undergraduate Admissions
(referencing FCPS' current grading policies)
Washington Post - 8.25.08  & FCPS-sponsored Roundtable 8.25.08




FAIRGRADE
Announcements:


  FAIRGRADE Leadership Team Endorses PATTY REED for School Board - Providence District


 

 

  Joint Press Release Re:  Superintendent Review 9.3.09

  FCPS Document 

Dual Enrollment Weighting


  FCPS Document 
TJHSST Honors Weighting


  FCPS Document
Honors Recommended for Additional 0.5 Weighting


  FCPS Document
Recommendations for Honors Course Weighting


 

  FCPS Press Release on Retro Honors Recommendations

  FAIRGRADE Calls for Oversight on Implementation of New Grading Scale 
Asks School Board to Ensure Academic Honors are Weighted Retroactively


 

  School Board Member & FAIRGRADE Supporter Kaye Kory Running for VA House of Delegates
Primary June 9th
Mason District


  School Board Seeks Parent Support for FY 2010 Budget

  Fairfax County Public Schools Press Release
Fairfax County School Board Votes to Change Grading Scale
Date:  1.23.09


  iPetition Signatures Hit 10,000
FAIRGRADE Press Release 1.22.09


  FAIRGRADE's Response to Washington Post Editorial
1.17.09


  Connection Newspaper Endorses FAIRGRADE
See the Full List Here


  Fairfax School Board Leans Toward New Grading Scale
The Washington Post 1.13.09


  Flunking Fairfax's Grades Report 
Letter to the Editor
The Washington Post 1.13.09


  Opponents of Grading Policy Turn Out in Force
The Washington Post 1.9.09 


  YouTube Links to Speakers in Support of FAIRGRADE
FCPS School Board Meeting 1.8.09


  FAIRGRADE Press Release on Impact of Letter Grades - 1.6.09

  FAIRGRADE Press Release on Superintendent Dale's Recommendation to Keep the Existing Grading Scale & Only Change Weights - 1.2.09

  FAIRGRADE Withdraws from FCPS Collaboration Citing Concerns with FCPS DRAFT Report

  FAIRGRADE Press Release on "iPetition Special Report" Sent to FCPS Officials 11.20.08

  Fairgrade Discovers FCPS Failed to Implement VA Transcript Requirement

  Financial Aid Calculator  & Academic Index Calculator Links HERE 

  Business Alliance for FAIRGRADE Press Conference HIGHLIGHTS & Press Release 10.15.08

  FAIRGRADE Press Release on Grading Policies Positions

  READ THE TRANSCRIPT - See What Admissions Officers Said at the Roundtable 

  FAIRGRADE Press Release on School Board's $130 Million Dollar Vote 9.20.08

  Washington Post Article re: FAIRGRADE 9.15.08

  FAIRGRADE Response to Sun Gazette Editorial

  Fairfax County Council of PTAs Endorses FAIRGRADE's Initiatives - Channel 9 TV Coverage

  MCA Backs Grading Revisions

  Press Release Re: SAT Scores 8.30.08

  FAIRGRADE Press Statement 8.25.08

  FCPS Final Report Due in Late Fall '08

  Business Leaders LOBBY for FAIRGRADE